I am grateful to Pickwick Publications for the review copy. In the interests of full disclosure, I should
add that Ben is a close friend of mine. He asked me to proofread the PhD thesis
on which Apostles Today is based, and
I also helped to prepare it for publication.
Many churches, especially those within the charismatic
traditions, believe that God is gifting and calling more and more people to be
‘apostles’. According to these churches, apostles are those whom Christ calls
and empowers by the Holy Spirit specifically for the sake of the Church’s
ongoing development and mission (cf. Ephesians 4:11-13). Moreover, apostles are
not necessarily ordained ministers; the term refers to a role rather than a
title or a position. The belief that God is calling a new generation (or new
generations) of apostles has ramifications for our ecclesiologies: How do the
‘newer’ churches and the more established, mainstream churches regard apostolic
ministry? Is the so-called charismatic apostolate (CA; the phrase comes from
Andrew Walker) a new phenomenon, or does it have historical precedent? And is
the CA limited to churches within the charismatic traditions? In this
thought-provoking study, Benjamin G. McNair Scott, a minister in the Church of
England, reflects on the historical and biblical foundations of the CA and offers
some suggestions on how it might influence (British) churches in the future.
The first section of Apostles
Today, ‘Where We Are’, engages with the CA traditions in both the United
States and Great Britain, and with a number of popular Christian authors,
including Derek Prince, Peter Wagner, Mike Breen, Terry Virgo, and Kenneth Hagin. Drawing from these sources, McNair Scott identifies three different
interpretations of ‘apostle’. First, there is the apostle type 1, which
presents apostles as having supreme authority in the churches. Apostle type 2
refers to select members of a congregation who are gifted as apostles but remain
under the authority of the local pastor or minister. Conversely, those
categorised as apostle type 3s are non-select members of a congregation gifted
to serve as apostles but who do not possess any special or absolute authority. (Essentially,
the difference between apostle types 2 and 3 lies in the application of
Ephesians 4:11-13: Are the gifts reserved for a chosen few or available to
all?) McNair Scott demonstrates a firm understanding of his source material,
and his categorisations (apostle types 1, 2, and 3) make sense of the diversity
of literature.
In the second section, ‘How We Got Here’, McNair Scott
sketches the history of charismatic apostles from the end of the first century
to the 1990s. As might be expected, from the early centuries to the Reformation
period, apostolic ministry is mainly identified with episcopal succession. However,
many groups that remained dissatisfied with the extent of the reforms during
the sixteenth century began to advocate an ongoing apostolic ministry directly
inspired by the Holy Spirit rather than legitimised through tradition. This
trend is widespread within modern charismatic traditions, and concepts of
apostolicity germane to these traditions find extensive dissemination through various
media, including popular-level books, television and radio programmes, and
‘gift courses’ – hence the increasing
popularity and acceptance of the CA, especially among churches with declining
memberships that desire nonetheless to have a greater missiological impact in
their communities. The turn to some form of apostolicity, where specific church
members are gifted apostles, is attractive.
The matter of the CA’s biblical support (or otherwise) is
the theme of the third section, ‘What We Should Make of It’. Of particular
importance are 1 Corinthians 12:28; 15:3-8; Ephesians 2:19-20; 4:11-13; and
Revelation 21:14. McNair Scott’s analysis suggests that the pivotal issue
concerns the supposed ongoing nature of apostolicity: Do the relevant New
Testament texts point to an ongoing CA, or do they assume that the gift will be
withdrawn once the Church has reached a certain developmental stage? Each
position has its advocates, but McNair Scott refuses to camp on either side of
the divide, and he holds that while the original twelve apostles, Paul, and
other first-generation apostles are unique given their roles in establishing
the Church, the biblical texts themselves do not rule out an ongoing CA. This does
not mean that McNair Scott endorses all that modern proponents of the CA claim.
Rather, given its legitimacy, McNair Scott seeks to determine how their general
ideas about the CA can take shape within more mainstream traditions. Apostle
type 1s do not help here; they do not allow for ecclesiological diversity,
ecumenical interactions, or for legitimate expressions of the Church outside of
the apostles’ own circles. Thus apostle types 2 and 3 allow for an
interpretation of the CA that identifies it with pioneering ministers and
church planters. Seen through these lenses, the CA is not such an incredible or
exegetically indefensible phenomenon – even the Church of England has its
pioneer ministers! – although each local expression of such apostolicity or
pioneering will doubtless take on forms conditioned by the immediate context.
The fourth and final section, ‘Where it Might Go’, contains
McNair Scott’s summary of his research and, importantly, his speculation about
the future of the CA in Britain. He sees little potential for apostle type 1s;
any influence they have will likely be through media or within the black
Pentecostal Church. Apostle type 2s (and, to a lesser extent, apostle type 3s),
interpreted as pioneer ministers and church planters, will find homes within
both independent and mainstream Christian denominations. Even within
non-Protestant churches, there is scope for the CA to exist, even if the term
‘apostle’ is not used. Thus the increasing attention paid to the CA is not an
example of faddism; for McNair Scott, the CA, however it is conceived, is of
paramount importance for the Church’s mission.
Apostles Today is
a compelling account of certain trends within both the charismatic traditions
and, increasingly, mainstream denominations. McNair Scott has shown that,
despite employing terminology that resonates mostly with charismatic-type ecclesiologies,
the concept of the CA is one found within a large number of churches, including
McNair Scott’s own Church of England. Arguably, this book will appeal mainly to
those who have some background in charismatic traditions; those unfamiliar with
the teachings of, say, Derek Prince or Terry Virgo may wonder why the matter of
an ongoing CA is important. That the matter is important and not merely
fascinating is something that gradually becomes clearer during the course of
the study, especially when McNair Scott draws attention to its mainstream
instantiations (e.g. Fresh Expressions and pioneer ministry). Here lies the
true value of this thesis: in effect, McNair Scott has demonstrated that the
Spirit’s distribution of gifts, including apostolic ministry, is for the Church
catholic and not just for particular traditions or denominations.
Terry, thank you for the review. I will check out this book, but I met some type 1 apostles who are deeply concerned about the wider body of Christ. Perhaps they are overshadowed in the Christian media by the more authoritarian type 1 apostles that by my opinion overstep their boundaries.
ReplyDelete